Science journals must have the laziest, most rent-seeking business model in the world: Capture the results of publically-funded research from scientists for free, have other scientists review and edit those results for free, then publish those results for an extortionate fee. There’s no doubt that this model is doomed.
Niche journals will feel the pinch first, but publishers of high-impact journals (which are highly valuable to scientist’s careers) may be able to weather economic effects. But now Singularity Hub reports a political boycott of one of those publishers Elsevier has started:
The boycott targets Elsevier, the publisher of popular journals like Cell and The Lancet, for its aggressive business practices, but opposition was electrified by Elsevier’s backing of a Congressional bill titled the Research Works Act (RWA). Though lesser known than the other high-profile, privacy-related bills SOPA and PIPA, the act was slated to reverse the Open Access Policy enacted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2008 that granted the public free access to any article derived from NIH-funded research.
Can you believe these jokers? Join the Elsevier boycott
The constant pressure to privatise the good, and socialize the risk is endemic.